Marketing Strategy

Google Ads vs Buying Personal Injury Leads: A Full ROI Comparison

Every personal injury firm that wants to scale marketing eventually asks the same question: do we run our own Google Ads for personal injury keywords, or do we buy leads from a vendor who already runs the ads? Both work. Both have real ROI. But they require completely different skill sets, time commitments, and risk profiles. This guide compares the two head-to-head so you can pick the right approach for your firm.

Running your own Google Ads: what it takes

To run your own PI ads at scale, you need:

Buying leads: what it takes

No media buying skill needed. No landing pages. No creative. No policy risk. First lead in 48–72 hours.

The math: cost per signed case, head to head

In our client dataset, established firms running their own Google Ads (with a good agency) hit a cost-per-signed-case of $1,100–$1,800 for auto accident leads. Firms buying exclusive leads from a vendor hit $900–$1,400. Shared leads: $700–$1,500.

The buying-leads approach usually wins on CPSC in the first year because the vendor already has the campaign optimization done. In year 2+, mature in-house Google Ads programs can beat vendor pricing, but require ongoing investment in a media buyer.

When Google Ads is the right call

When buying leads is the right call

The hybrid approach most firms end up on

The majority of scaled PI firms end up doing both: a core Google Ads program for their home geo, plus vendor-purchased leads to scale into secondary geos and fill capacity when in-house campaigns dip. Start with buying leads to prove the intake operation, then layer in-house media buying once you understand what a good lead looks like. Book a call to talk through what mix makes sense for your firm.

Ready to buy personal injury leads?

Book a 15-minute call to walk through live lead inventory in your geo, pricing, and a 30-day delivery plan tailored to your firm.

Book a Call

Keep reading